Archive for the ‘nanotechnology’ Category

This entry may very well tick a few people off, and so for that I apologize to those who take offense and are challenged by this; however, it is necessary to keep the records straight and the information as pure as possible.

We have such a fight ahead of us with our current health system, that the point I am really making with this post is that we should stop picking on each other and unify…Unify or Die, as they say!

An email was shared with me about an article on Chemtrails and Morgellons from the group Exotic Warfare.com.

All in all, it is a good read; reporting on the different materials that are making up the ‘chaff’ from chemtrails and aerial spraying operations and evidence about the different patents issued in the nanotechnology world. Each nano material that is created has a ‘signature’ so it can be identified.

The reason for this is obvious…ownership. Right now, the race for who wins the most effective uses on nanotechnology is full speed ahead.

It is big business just like Stem Cell Research is, and among the players are…
IBM
Military Groups
Lockheed Martin/NASA
And the Top Universities in the world

Each one of the individuals within these groups, must and did sign a NDA aka Non Disclosure Agreement and this is why we are having a hard time getting the truth. Not so much that it is conspiracy secrecy…but that it is business secrets.

They can not talk about the research they are working on, otherwise they are out of a job.

I recommend doing some ground reading with a book called, Nanotechnology For Dummies, to familiarize yourself with the basics.

The toxic complications of this growing field of technology, which is already in our everyday medicines and skin care products, is a magnitude of danger we still do not fully understand, and most of Joe Public is in the dark about.

For this, I commend all who are trying to raise this awareness, and I implore you to do it without the fear inducing tactics. The truth is scary enough without adding any spin.

Now I want to speak to the ‘evidence’ they present in an old newspaper article, from 1993, revealing potential misconduct on the part Dr. Staninger.

The HGV is no longer in direct association with Dr. Staninger so there is nothing I gain from what I am about to say…we have come across many concerns and character assassination attempts about her. I guess it goes with her Karma, if you will.

…despite all that, she is a top notch toxicologist and indeed knows a lot. Her protocol that targets advanced nano materials is what helped me recover from Morgellons, and Lyme disease as well.

She did write The Comprehensive Handbook of Hazardous Materials… that is used as a field guide by the EPA! – whether some of her degrees or affiliations are ‘loose’ – she still knows her stuff and is recognized in the professional circles for her knowledge on poisons.

She is also known for shooting her mouth off and being a loose cannon. This pisses a lot of people off, I have personal experience with this one too.

What is important to remember is this:
NO ONE has created a single conclusive protocol that works for everyone suffering from Morgellons. None of the doctors and none of the home remedies can say their protocol is 100% effective for everyone.

The working parts of this disease are so complicated, multi-factored, and multi-faceted; involving biological, non-biological, GMO, nanotechnology, and chemical exposures of all sorts. (especially ones being marketed to us as household cleaners, medicines, and food!)

There is a basic law of chemistry which tracks the different intermediary reactions that occur when 2 compounds or substances come into contact with each other.

We must now look at ourselves/bodies as test tubes in a lab. Every time we introduce a new substance into our systems it will react with what is already there, possibly creating a hyper toxic condition at any time.

(This is why MMS and Nutri-silver are so dangerous, sorry but I had to say this, it is true!)

Each person is a TOTALLY different test tube of toxic goo, depending on that individual’s immune system, toxic stores, and bio terrain condition.

I never say the far infrared is all we need for recovery, but I do say, it is the most important detox tool we have.

The reason for this is it is the same energy that births life. Without it, life would not exist today, mother’s could not carry an unborn child to full term.

Far infrared pushes out ANY toxin from our cellular terrain, no matter what its called, and enhances our detox supplements and products to do their job as effectively as is naturally possible. This is the nature of this light frequency, designed by Mother Nature!

Any far infrared rays that are not utilized by the body, pass harmlessly on.

It was the far infrared sauna that gave me my real relief after more than 6 months of sleepless nights, 1000s of dollars spent on things that did not work, and isolated living conditions because I thought I was contagious. I was religious about using it…every day for 45 days straight until I was completely symptom free. I also followed a full 90 day detox protocol and to this day, I still utilize these principles and products to stay ‘clean’.

This is not about killing off or surviving through a disease and that’s it, you never have it again, like Chicken Pox.
We are constantly being exposed to harmful materials. I do agree with the article in that geo-engineering aka chemtrails are a great hazard to our health.

We must become alert and vocal to this environmental crime!

I recommend watching the movie “Lorenzo’s Oil” to really grasp the extent and research it takes to discover a ‘new’ protocol for recovering from something the medical community is ignoring.

This is a true story and it deeply strikes at the cord of truth about our health care system. It is a very important movie to watch if you really want your health back.

Back to point on Dr. S and the implication to debunk her credibility…

I really have to ask…What is the point of bashing Dr. S? Is this article trying to say it is only the type of nanotechnology identified in this article that is the health problem, and since Dr. S was once on the hot seat, she is no longer a valuable researcher and advocate to our environment and health?

If so, this is absolutely ridiculous and sophomoric. This would truly be a great disservice to the growing pool of knowledge being shared today to help us recover and stay healthy.

Or is it just to debunk Dr. S?
If so, please read more facts about the whistle she was blowing on the toxic problems associated with Benlate:

http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_Product.jsp?REG_NR=00035200354&DIST_NR=000352

and

http://benlate.legalview.info/

These validate that there was/is a problem using Benlate fungicide by DuPont which is the main point Dr S was making.

Almost 20 years ago she came under fire for claiming this was a potential health risk.
In 2001, they finally take it off the market after being cited in thousands of lawsuits against DuPont for causing birth defects among many other issues. The EPA now classifies Benlate as a potential carcinogen and it is listed as a developmental and reproductive toxin.

HELLO!!!! ?
So who was really the one to be cited for misconduct, DuPont or Dr Staninger?

At the end of the article from Exotic warfare, they caution us to do diligence on our research…
Well, I agree and do hope those who point fingers will please walk the talk, and realize that friend or foe – we are all in this toxic soup together and really better start playing nice together if we want to actually recover completely into a future scape that doesn’t resemble the movie “Wallye”.

I am not trying to bash heads with anyone, that is a waste of time. I am a seriously concerned mom with 3 kids whose future matters to me, and the time is now to find solutions.

Cooperation and participation are essential, and reporting the truth must be done with great vigilance.

May the next Recovery Story be yours,
Ramona and the Healing Grapevine

Geoengineering, aka chemtrails, is here – and all it takes to discover this, is spending a few days doing what we used to do as kids…lie on your back in the grass and watch the clouds go by.

In certain areas, like Phoenix AZ, you won’t have any trouble seeing several jet planes passing overhead with what we all used to call ‘contrails’ streaming out the either the sides or back of the plane.

But if you are patient, you will discover these contrails don’t go away. Normally a true contrail is made of mostly ice crystals and will dissipate within a few minutes of the passing plane. Most of the contrails of today, will ‘stick up’ there for the afternoon. They will open, becoming fluffier or maybe even fan out into cloud wisps.

Then you will notice that another plane flies by and the ‘contrail’ of that plane intersects with the other one. At the end of a successful day of drawing white lines in the sky, we have hazy cloud cover.

These ‘contrails’ don’t make the billowy, fluffy clouds of our childhood days and sometimes when the sun-rays shine through them, they have a funny shiny quality with pinks, blues and greens reflecting within these wispy clouds.

Dr. Ben Colodzin wrote a great paper that was presented at the 2010 Health Freedom USA War Council hosted by the Natural Solutions Foundation in Jan 2010.

In his paper, Dr. Colodzin, takes a timeline look at the many elements behind today’s controversial subject of chemtrails, geoengineering and aerial spraying.

Starting back in 1949, beginning with the Geneva Act for using chemical and biological weapons, we began using aerial spraying as a means for delivery.

Now you might remember that back in 1972, we became one of the signatory nations of the Biological Toxin Weapons Convention that agreed to cease with this strategy and in 1973 our stockpiles of biological weapons were destroyed.

However, many subsequent amendments to the Geneva Act, and parallel U.S. Acts including the 2001 Patriot Act, 2001 Space Preservation Act, and the 2005 Weather Modification Research and Technology Act, have expanded authority to conduct aerial spray operations over U.S. territory for a wide variety of purposes.

Hmmmm. Weather Modification Research and Technology Act.

In his paper, Dr. Colodzin connects the many forms of aerial spraying activity with the emergence of the Morgellons syndrome, especially in regards to the Morgellons symptoms associated with advanced nano materials. In patients treated for Morgellons by Dr. Staninger, the testing of the fibers and lesions revealed many forms of these nano-materials were present.

Whether it is Morgellons, or the huge increase in various auto-immune disorders and respiratory conditions like childhood asthma, our air quality is in a state of emergency.

As Dr. Colodzin finishes his paper by stating:
“None of these space age technologies that are the new whiz-bang toys of aerial spray operations are essentially evil. They each have wonderful life-enhancing applications for which they could be used. It is only a matter of true intent and counter intent. We just need them to be programmed and regulated by a consciousness that values LIFE, that’s ALL.”

With that being said, the question I ask is – because the ‘powers that be’ behind these operations are still hiding the truth, are they of the consciousness that values all life?

Take the day off and watch the sky for yourself. Over time, you too will see some things that just don’t belong. Once you spot them, you will see them in skylines of movies and television shows…they are everywhere.

So what the heck are they spraying, is a great question to ask!

This is the expressed opinion of Ramona, and of course the other individuals cited in this post. As well as the thousands of other Global inhabitants who have already spent the day on their backs to see for them selves!

Thank you all for sharing.

For the moment, the fact remains that issuing a mandatory vaccination violates our constitutional rights. I say ‘for the moment’ because I have witnessed an enormous amount of insanity within the medical industry and “Insanity knows no boundaries!”

I remember when my first daughter was born back in 1990, I was bullied into vaccinating her by the doctor’s artful use of guilt. ‘I was a bad, neglectful mother if I didn’t ensure my child’s health and safety by administering these shots.’ I allowed my pediatrician to give her the first round of vaccinations even though I had strong gut feelings that this was unnecessary and unhealthy.

That afternoon, as I sat and watched my beautiful little baby cry in pain and discomfort as she tried to assimilate the toxic ingredients in that shot, I did my research.

It only took a few facts to strengthen my intuition and I have not allowed any of my three girls to be immunized since.

For example, I found reports that formaldehyde was sometimes discovered in a vaccination. According to the FDA, there is no acceptably safe amount of formaldehyde for a person to consume.

In 1994 a report was posted within the FDA about the use of formaldehyde within the sterilization process of some drug manufacturer’s facilities. http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/Inspections/InspectionGuides/ucm074930.htm. “The indirect testing of product or drug substance to demonstrate the absence of formaldehyde levels in a system is unacceptable. One large foreign drug substance manufacturer, after formaldehyde sterilization of the system, had to reject the initial batches coming through the system because of formaldehyde contamination.

Unfortunately, they relied on end product testing of the product and not on direct sampling to determine the absence of formaldehyde residues on equipment.”
Couple this with the use of mercury-based preservatives, short testing periods, AND the fact that drug companies can not be sued in a regular court of law (there is this thing called a vaccine court??!! which is outside the regular system) and that was all I needed to know.

Today they substitute an aluminum version for the mercury after so much controversy and research linking it to autism. The question is; is aluminum going to offer any safety against toxic build up? I doubt it.

Over the years I have been challenged by school principals and daycare centers to provide an immunization schedule or my child will not be allowed to attend.

I only had to say a few words and they immediately handed me a release form to sign, “My personal or religious belief is…” and my kids have gone to any school, public or private, that I enrolled them in.

It is really important to look at the language being used in the media, in our school system, and from our government. It is guilt ridden and worded in such a way that it appears to be a law. Please remember, the law actually states I have the right to make choices based on my personal/religious beliefs and can not be incriminated for this choice.

When I came under the care of Dr. Staninger last year, I asked her specifically about my kids state of health for their future. She said the fact that I had not vaccinated them was one of the best things I could have done to ensure they have a healthy, strong immune system. She has been reporting the fact that much of today’s medicines, including vaccines, are loaded with nanotechnology.

When intuition is backed up by research it can be one of the best defenses we have for living in this dynamic time.

I want to leave you with one more tidbit of info I read from a virology professor’s blog. He states that over 10 to the 16th power human immunodeficiency virus genomes are produced daily on the entire planet. As a consequence, thousands of viral mutants arise by chance every day that are resistant to every combination of antiviral compounds in use or in development. If that’s the case, the tactic of vaccinating against new diseases is like trying to run a race with cement shoes on.

Our immune system needs to be as state of the art and resistant as possible for a healthy life in this 21st Century and there is no hard-core evidence proving immunizations is an effective course of action. Go researching for yourself.

Thank you and I hope this helps you make educated choices for your self and your family.

Ramona and the Healing Grapevine Team

I find myself not only checking food labels these days to avoid the nasties like high fructose corn syrup, modified food starch and hydrogenated oils, to name a few, but I also attempt to get organic whenever its available. Believe it or not we still have to check the organic labels too. The more I go down the rabbit hole with this, the more I realize how impossible it is becoming to find REAL organic produce.

Even looking at our authentic local farmer you have to ask yourself how does he avoid the chemtrails?  As for the food on the shelf we have no clue. As educated consumers, we now have to look at organic labels and ask “how organic is it really?”  There is a new threat on the horizon which may put real organic farming into the history books as the “good old days”.

The following is an article published on The Alliance For Natural Health which reveals our newest threat to the organic farming industry: Nanotechnology.

Nanotechnology, the process of manipulating matter at the atomic and molecular level, has no place in organic food. Like genetic modification, it is the antithesis of the organic concept.

Members at the Organic Consumers Union and others recently asked that the United States National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture formally prohibit the use of nanotechnology in organic food production. The NOSB member from General Mills sought to delay the process by demanding that a technical definition of the term be developed. The committee then responded by requesting a technical and scientific review of the issue.

Canada has already acted. It recently amended its national organic rules to ban nanotechnology in food production as a “Prohibited Substance or Method.”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is hearing from large food companies on this issue, and has a record of siding with industry against consumers, as some of our earlier stories have shown. It is important that we let USDA know that consumers care deeply about maintaining and preserving real organic standards. Please add your voice by taking action now to support the ban on nanotechnology in organic foods TAKE ACTION.

God bless these guys..they are the Greenpeace of the alternative health industry. Another article I noticed on this site talked about a Russian study on the side effects of Genetically Modified Soy Feed on hamsters. The effects were minimal until the third generation which suffered sever effects and complete sterility. Does one conclude that GMO’s have been introduced as a solution to reducing world population?

Whatever the short or long term goals are; Nanotechnology is here to stay and living with the side effects is the new history being written right now. We are blessed to have Dr. Staninger by our side to assist us all to deal with these side effects. If you didn’t get to read the incredible results of her Intro Detox Kit …the results are phenomenal. I had to ask myself how can a simple solution like this be so powerful?

The answer always lies in the the bodies ability to heal itself. The body can heal anything if given the right nutrition to do so. If there is not enough it looks after vital organs and puts the secondary issues on hold. I knew one guy who had a 20 year old war scar suppurate open and heal completely after correcting his system. This is true for all our body’s systems, if given the right detox therapy and nutrients they will purge the toxins. The new Recover Now Protocol will give you an opportunity to detox and rebuild you body like never before. For those of you who have been waiting for our doors to open the time is near….

We are really excited to be able to share this with you.

The Healing Grapevine Team

As a lover of science fiction, with a geeky personality, I’ve always enjoyed experimenting on the cutting edge of technology.  It is my passion, and  since the days of Star Wars I’ve wanted to build an R2D2.  Fascinated recently by nanotechnology, I’ve watched with great interest as the robotics and electronics industries have had their emerging technologies leap into exponentially accelerated growth.  I see such potential for great and amazing things to come out of this technology.  Things that Asimov did not dare to dream just a few short years ago, are almost upon us!

However, I watch now with a mixture of anticipation and trepidation as our ability with technology has literally gone beyond our means to understand it’s implications.  Our current situation is one of a small child playing with fire.

Most societies in the world today have put into place governments intended to “keep us safe” – intended to provide us with a safe path upon which we can tread, knowing the next generation will have a world to inherit.

I think it’s time for us to raise the flag and tell our governments that sanctions need to be put into place quickly, to insure that there is indeed a next generation to inherit our world… and even more to the point, that there will be a world worth inheriting.

We are on a precarious precipice which, at this point needs our attention.  It needs our voice.  If some strong regulations are not quickly put in place, we will likely find ourselves in a situation which we do not have the technology to undo.

Below are some examples of the state of affairs at the moment:

Safety ignored in nanotech rush, warn experts
From scidev.net (01,13,2010). Developing countries have embarked on a nanotechnology spree in the absence of health and safety guidelines, experts have cautioned. Countries including China, India, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam are intensively seeking to commercialize nanotechnology. But unlike the European Union, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States — which have taken public concerns on board and developed preliminary guidance documents on the use of the technology — developing countries are not engaging in public discourse, said experts at a workshop on nanotechnology governance and regulation held in Delhi, India, last week (8 January). The workshop, supported by Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC), focused on India but participants said that the situation was similar in most developing countries engaged in nanotechnology research. In the absence of regulation “it is a free for all”, said Alok Dhawan, a researcher at the Indian Institute of Toxicology Research.

U.S. faces widening information gap on nanotechnology
From University of Wisconsin-Madison (01,13,2010). As the global nanotechnology industry continues to produce cutting-edge consumer products, the scientific community is leaving a key part of the U.S. public behind when sharing knowledge of this new field of science, according to a new study by the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Arizona State University.

FBD: Food industry “too secretive” about nanotechnology
From foodbizdaily.com (01,09,2010). The Food and Drink Federation has leapt to the defense of its members after a Lords committee criticized the food industry for being secretive about nanotechnology research. The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee report, ‘Nanotechnologies and Food’, claimed that the food industry was failing to be transparent about its research into the uses of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. It said that the approach of food companies was to not publish or discuss details of its research, and while the food industry is right to be concerned about negative public reactions to developments in nanotechnologies, appearing to be secretive about its research “is exactly the type of behavior which may bring about the public reaction it is trying to avert”.

Lords call for clarity over nanotech in food
From Royal Society of Chemistry (01,12,2010). The UK House of Lords science and technology select committee has called for more research into the use of nanomaterials in food and criticized the food industry for failing to be open about its use of nanotechnology. In a report published on 8 January, the select committee concluded that, although current legislation should be adequate to protect consumers, more research is needed into the toxicological effects of nanomaterials in food products. It also called for more transparency between the food industry, government and consumers about the use of nanotechnology in food. The committee was particularly concerned about effective public communication regarding nanomaterials in food, aiming to avoid the negative reactions that have been seen over biotechnology and genetic modification, while keeping people informed about what is going into their food. The report proposes that the UK Food Standards Agency work with the food industry to develop and maintain an online register of all products containing nanomaterials and a database of materials in development.

Nanotechnology in the UK Food Industry Attacked
From emailwire.com (01,12,2010). The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee chastised the food industry for being secretive with its lack of transparency on nanomaterial research being conducted to determine the technology’s safe use in food products. It’s a criticism that took the food industry and its lobbying group, The Food and Drink Federation, by surprise.

Nanoscience poses solutions, problems for environmental ills
From Northwestern University (01,14,2010). Story by Thomas Forrest Imagine a cloud blocking out the sun’s light, engulfing the world in darkness as people lived their fossil fueled dominated lives. This was the proposal of some scientists on Tuesday night in Northwestern University. Franz Geiger, associate professor of physical chemistry at Northwestern University, explained the potential benefits and ethical dilemma of such a situation at the third annual Nanotechnology Town Hall Meeting at Abbot Auditorium.

Loud Starts End France’s Nanotech Debates
From blogs.sciencemag.org (01,15,2010). France’s Special Commission for the Public Debate on Nanotechnology is organizing a 4-month discussion in 17 cities to inform the public about advances and dilemmas in nanotechnology and to give citizens a chance to express their opinion. But environmentalists dispute the legitimacy of the discussions, which they say are one-sided and a whitewash, and have decided to disrupt them wherever they can.

As members of this Global Family, the entire team of the Healing Grapevine issue this simple, yet loud call for awareness.